Add effect checks on the accesscontrol specs (#4099)
This commit is contained in:
@ -44,22 +44,27 @@ rule onlyGrantCanGrant(env e, bytes32 role, address account) {
|
||||
rule grantRoleEffect(env e) {
|
||||
require nonpayable(e);
|
||||
|
||||
bytes32 role1; bytes32 role2;
|
||||
address account1; address account2;
|
||||
bytes32 role;
|
||||
bytes32 otherRole;
|
||||
address account;
|
||||
address otherAccount;
|
||||
|
||||
bool isCallerAdmin = hasRole(getRoleAdmin(role2), e.msg.sender);
|
||||
bool hasRoleBefore = hasRole(role1, account1);
|
||||
bool isCallerAdmin = hasRole(getRoleAdmin(role), e.msg.sender);
|
||||
bool hasOtherRoleBefore = hasRole(otherRole, otherAccount);
|
||||
|
||||
grantRole@withrevert(e, role2, account2);
|
||||
assert !lastReverted <=> isCallerAdmin;
|
||||
grantRole@withrevert(e, role, account);
|
||||
bool success = !lastReverted;
|
||||
|
||||
bool hasRoleAfter = hasRole(role1, account1);
|
||||
bool hasOtherRoleAfter = hasRole(otherRole, otherAccount);
|
||||
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
hasRoleBefore != hasRoleAfter
|
||||
) => (
|
||||
hasRoleAfter == true && role1 == role2 && account1 == account2
|
||||
);
|
||||
// liveness
|
||||
assert success <=> isCallerAdmin;
|
||||
|
||||
// effect
|
||||
assert success => hasRole(role, account);
|
||||
|
||||
// no side effect
|
||||
assert hasOtherRoleBefore != hasOtherRoleAfter => (role == otherRole && account == otherAccount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -70,22 +75,27 @@ rule grantRoleEffect(env e) {
|
||||
rule revokeRoleEffect(env e) {
|
||||
require nonpayable(e);
|
||||
|
||||
bytes32 role1; bytes32 role2;
|
||||
address account1; address account2;
|
||||
bytes32 role;
|
||||
bytes32 otherRole;
|
||||
address account;
|
||||
address otherAccount;
|
||||
|
||||
bool isCallerAdmin = hasRole(getRoleAdmin(role2), e.msg.sender);
|
||||
bool hasRoleBefore = hasRole(role1, account1);
|
||||
bool isCallerAdmin = hasRole(getRoleAdmin(role), e.msg.sender);
|
||||
bool hasOtherRoleBefore = hasRole(otherRole, otherAccount);
|
||||
|
||||
revokeRole@withrevert(e, role2, account2);
|
||||
assert !lastReverted <=> isCallerAdmin;
|
||||
revokeRole@withrevert(e, role, account);
|
||||
bool success = !lastReverted;
|
||||
|
||||
bool hasRoleAfter = hasRole(role1, account1);
|
||||
bool hasOtherRoleAfter = hasRole(otherRole, otherAccount);
|
||||
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
hasRoleBefore != hasRoleAfter
|
||||
) => (
|
||||
hasRoleAfter == false && role1 == role2 && account1 == account2
|
||||
);
|
||||
// liveness
|
||||
assert success <=> isCallerAdmin;
|
||||
|
||||
// effect
|
||||
assert success => !hasRole(role, account);
|
||||
|
||||
// no side effect
|
||||
assert hasOtherRoleBefore != hasOtherRoleAfter => (role == otherRole && account == otherAccount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -96,19 +106,24 @@ rule revokeRoleEffect(env e) {
|
||||
rule renounceRoleEffect(env e) {
|
||||
require nonpayable(e);
|
||||
|
||||
bytes32 role1; bytes32 role2;
|
||||
address account1; address account2;
|
||||
bytes32 role;
|
||||
bytes32 otherRole;
|
||||
address account;
|
||||
address otherAccount;
|
||||
|
||||
bool hasRoleBefore = hasRole(role1, account1);
|
||||
bool hasOtherRoleBefore = hasRole(otherRole, otherAccount);
|
||||
|
||||
renounceRole@withrevert(e, role2, account2);
|
||||
assert !lastReverted <=> account2 == e.msg.sender;
|
||||
renounceRole@withrevert(e, role, account);
|
||||
bool success = !lastReverted;
|
||||
|
||||
bool hasRoleAfter = hasRole(role1, account1);
|
||||
bool hasOtherRoleAfter = hasRole(otherRole, otherAccount);
|
||||
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
hasRoleBefore != hasRoleAfter
|
||||
) => (
|
||||
hasRoleAfter == false && role1 == role2 && account1 == account2
|
||||
);
|
||||
// liveness
|
||||
assert success <=> account == e.msg.sender;
|
||||
|
||||
// effect
|
||||
assert success => !hasRole(role, account);
|
||||
|
||||
// no side effect
|
||||
assert hasOtherRoleBefore != hasOtherRoleAfter => (role == otherRole && account == otherAccount);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user