openzeppelin-contracts/docs/modules/ROOT/pages/utilities.adoc

= Utilities

OpenZeppelin provides a ton of useful utilities that you can use in your project. Here are some of the more popular ones:

[[cryptography]]
== Cryptography

* link:api/cryptography#ecdsa[`ECDSA`] — provides functions for recovering and managing Ethereum account ECDSA signatures:
* to use it, declare: `using ECDSA for bytes32;`
* signatures are tightly packed, 65 byte `bytes` that look like `{v (1)} {r (32)} {s (32)}`
** this is the default from `web3.eth.sign` so you probably don't need to worry about this format
* recover the signer using link:api/cryptography#ECDSA.recover(bytes32,bytes)[`myDataHash.recover(signature)`]
* if you are using `eth_personalSign`, the signer will hash your data and then add the prefix `\x19Ethereum Signed Message:\n`, so if you're attempting to recover the signer of an Ethereum signed message hash, you'll want to use link:api/cryptography#ECDSA.toEthSignedMessageHash(bytes32)[`toEthSignedMessageHash`]

Use these functions in combination to verify that a user has signed some information on-chain:

[source,solidity]
----
keccack256(
    abi.encodePacked(
        someData,
        moreData
    )
)
.toEthSignedMessageHash()
.recover(signature)
----

* link:api/cryptography#merkleproof[`MerkleProof`] — provides link:api/cryptography#MerkleProof.verify(bytes32%5B%5D,bytes32,bytes32)[`verify`] for verifying merkle proofs.

[[introspection]]
== Introspection

In Solidity, it's frequently helpful to know whether or not a contract supports an interface you'd like to use. ERC165 is a standard that helps do runtime interface detection. OpenZeppelin provides some helpers, both for implementing ERC165 in your contracts and querying other contracts:

* link:api/introspection#ierc165[`IERC165`] — this is the ERC165 interface that defines link:api/introspection#IERC165.supportsInterface(bytes4)[`supportsInterface`]. When implementing ERC165, you'll conform to this interface.
* link:api/introspection#erc165[`ERC165`] — inherit this contract if you'd like to support interface detection using a lookup table in contract storage. You can register interfaces using link:api/introspection#ERC165._registerInterface(bytes4)[`_registerInterface(bytes4)`]: check out example usage as part of the ERC721 implementation.
* link:api/introspection#erc165checker[`ERC165Checker`] — ERC165Checker simplifies the process of checking whether or not a contract supports an interface you care about.
* include with `using ERC165Checker for address;`
* link:api/introspection#ERC165Checker._supportsInterface(address,bytes4)[`myAddress._supportsInterface(bytes4)`]
* link:api/introspection#ERC165Checker._supportsAllInterfaces(address,bytes4%5B%5D)[`myAddress._supportsAllInterfaces(bytes4[])`]

[source,solidity]
----
contract MyContract {
    using ERC165Checker for address;

    bytes4 private InterfaceId_ERC721 = 0x80ac58cd;

    /**
     * @dev transfer an ERC721 token from this contract to someone else
     */
    function transferERC721(
        address token,
        address to,
        uint256 tokenId
    )
        public
    {
        require(token.supportsInterface(InterfaceId_ERC721), "IS_NOT_721_TOKEN");
        IERC721(token).transferFrom(address(this), to, tokenId);
    }
}
----

[[math]]
== Math

The most popular math related library OpenZeppelin provides is link:api/math#safemath[`SafeMath`], which provides mathematical functions that protect your contract from overflows and underflows.

Include the contract with `using SafeMath for uint256;` and then call the functions:

* `myNumber.add(otherNumber)`
* `myNumber.sub(otherNumber)`
* `myNumber.div(otherNumber)`
* `myNumber.mul(otherNumber)`
* `myNumber.mod(otherNumber)`

Easy!

[[payment]]
== Payment

Want to split some payments between multiple people? Maybe you have an app that sends 30% of art purchases to the original creator and 70% of the profits to the current owner; you can build that with link:api/payment#paymentsplitter[`PaymentSplitter`]!

In solidity, there are some security concerns with blindly sending money to accounts, since it allows them to execute arbitrary code. You can read up on these security concerns in the https://consensys.github.io/smart-contract-best-practices/[Ethereum Smart Contract Best Practices] website. One of the ways to fix reentrancy and stalling problems is, instead of immediately sending Ether to accounts that need it, you can use link:api/payment#pullpayment[`PullPayment`], which offers an link:api/payment#PullPayment._asyncTransfer(address,uint256)[`_asyncTransfer`] function for sending money to something and requesting that they link:api/payment#PullPayment.withdrawPayments(address%20payable)[`withdrawPayments()`] it later.

If you want to Escrow some funds, check out link:api/payment#escrow[`Escrow`] and link:api/payment#conditionalescrow[`ConditionalEscrow`] for governing the release of some escrowed Ether.

[[misc]]
=== Misc

Want to check if an address is a contract? Use link:api/utils#address[`Address`] and link:api/utils#Address.isContract(address)[`Address.isContract()`].

Want to keep track of some numbers that increment by 1 every time you want another one? Check out link:api/drafts#counter[`Counter`]. This is especially useful for creating incremental ERC721 `tokenId`s like we did in the last section.