From 6ae2c17bfe9317de1702b5873d694595ac002c93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Alexander=20Gonz=C3=A1lez?= <alexfertel97@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:21:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove outdated comment in ERC-20 (#4964)

---
 contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol b/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol
index cf7332858..f5b70f08c 100644
--- a/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol
+++ b/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol
@@ -25,11 +25,6 @@ import {IERC20Errors} from "../../interfaces/draft-IERC6093.sol";
  * instead returning `false` on failure. This behavior is nonetheless
  * conventional and does not conflict with the expectations of ERC-20
  * applications.
- *
- * Additionally, an {Approval} event is emitted on calls to {transferFrom}.
- * This allows applications to reconstruct the allowance for all accounts just
- * by listening to said events. Other implementations of the ERC may not emit
- * these events, as it isn't required by the specification.
  */
 abstract contract ERC20 is Context, IERC20, IERC20Metadata, IERC20Errors {
     mapping(address account => uint256) private _balances;