NoBey/openzeppelin-contracts
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: add comment about rbacwithadmin being rather powerful (#936)

Browse Source 
* fix: add comment about rbacwithadmin being rather powerful
* fix: move RBACWithAdmin to examples
This commit is contained in:
Matt Condon
2018-06-04 12:32:57 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 32ec8b5398
commit 2637bd89be
2 changed files with 9 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
contracts/ownership/rbac/RBACWithAdmin.sol → contracts/examples/RBACWithAdmin.sol
View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
pragma solidity ^0.4.23; pragma solidity ^0.4.23;
import "./RBAC.sol"; import "../ownership/rbac/RBAC.sol";
/** /**
@ -8,6 +8,13 @@ import "./RBAC.sol";
* @author Matt Condon (@Shrugs) * @author Matt Condon (@Shrugs)
* @dev It's recommended that you define constants in the contract, * @dev It's recommended that you define constants in the contract,
* @dev like ROLE_ADMIN below, to avoid typos. * @dev like ROLE_ADMIN below, to avoid typos.
* @dev
* @dev NOTE: RBACWithAdmin is probably too expansive and powerful for your
* @dev application; an admin is actually able to change any address to any role
* @dev which is a very large API surface. It's recommended that you follow a strategy
* @dev of strictly defining the abilities of your roles
* @dev and the API-surface of your contract.
* @dev This is just an example for example's sake.
*/ */
contract RBACWithAdmin is RBAC { contract RBACWithAdmin is RBAC {
/** /**

2
contracts/mocks/RBACMock.sol
View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
pragma solidity ^0.4.23; pragma solidity ^0.4.23;
import "../ownership/rbac/RBACWithAdmin.sol"; import "../examples/RBACWithAdmin.sol";
contract RBACMock is RBACWithAdmin { contract RBACMock is RBACWithAdmin {