Reorder arguments for multiProof functions (#3447)
This commit is contained in:
committed by
GitHub
parent
35090c1bf1
commit
113443470c
@ -30,19 +30,19 @@ contract MerkleProofWrapper {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function multiProofVerify(
|
||||
bytes32 root,
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata leafs,
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata proofs,
|
||||
bool[] calldata proofFlag
|
||||
bool[] calldata proofFlag,
|
||||
bytes32 root,
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata leaves
|
||||
) public pure returns (bool) {
|
||||
return MerkleProof.multiProofVerify(root, leafs, proofs, proofFlag);
|
||||
return MerkleProof.multiProofVerify(proofs, proofFlag, root, leaves);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function processMultiProof(
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata leafs,
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata proofs,
|
||||
bool[] calldata proofFlag
|
||||
bool[] calldata proofFlag,
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata leaves
|
||||
) public pure returns (bytes32) {
|
||||
return MerkleProof.processMultiProof(leafs, proofs, proofFlag);
|
||||
return MerkleProof.processMultiProof(proofs, proofFlag, leaves);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
||||
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @dev These functions deal with verification of Merkle Trees proofs.
|
||||
* @dev These functions deal with verification of Merkle Tree proofs.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The proofs can be generated using the JavaScript library
|
||||
* https://github.com/miguelmota/merkletreejs[merkletreejs].
|
||||
@ -75,43 +75,41 @@ library MerkleProof {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @dev Returns true if a `leafs` can be proved to be a part of a Merkle tree
|
||||
* defined by `root`. For this, `proofs` for each leaf must be provided, containing
|
||||
* sibling hashes on the branch from the leaf to the root of the tree. Then
|
||||
* 'proofFlag' designates the nodes needed for the multi proof.
|
||||
* @dev Returns true if the `leaves` can be proved to be a part of a Merkle tree defined by
|
||||
* `root`, according to `proof` and `proofFlags` as described in {processMultiProof}.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* _Available since v4.7._
|
||||
*/
|
||||
function multiProofVerify(
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata proof,
|
||||
bool[] calldata proofFlags,
|
||||
bytes32 root,
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata leaves,
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata proofs,
|
||||
bool[] calldata proofFlag
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata leaves
|
||||
) internal pure returns (bool) {
|
||||
return processMultiProof(leaves, proofs, proofFlag) == root;
|
||||
return processMultiProof(proof, proofFlags, leaves) == root;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @dev Returns the rebuilt hash obtained by traversing a Merkle tree up
|
||||
* from `leaf` using the multi proof as `proofFlag`. A multi proof is
|
||||
* valid if the final hash matches the root of the tree.
|
||||
* @dev Returns the root of a tree reconstructed from `leaves` and the sibling nodes in `proof`,
|
||||
* consuming from one or the other at each step according to the instructions given by
|
||||
* `proofFlags`.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* _Available since v4.7._
|
||||
*/
|
||||
function processMultiProof(
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata leaves,
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata proofs,
|
||||
bool[] calldata proofFlag
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata proof,
|
||||
bool[] calldata proofFlags,
|
||||
bytes32[] calldata leaves
|
||||
) internal pure returns (bytes32 merkleRoot) {
|
||||
// This function rebuild the root hash by traversing the tree up from the leaves. The root is rebuilt by
|
||||
// consuming and producing values on a queue. The queue starts with the `leaves` array, then goes onto the
|
||||
// `hashes` array. At the end of the process, the last hash in the `hashes` array should contain the root of
|
||||
// the merkle tree.
|
||||
uint256 leavesLen = leaves.length;
|
||||
uint256 totalHashes = proofFlag.length;
|
||||
uint256 totalHashes = proofFlags.length;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check proof validity.
|
||||
require(leavesLen + proofs.length - 1 == totalHashes, "MerkleProof: invalid multiproof");
|
||||
require(leavesLen + proof.length - 1 == totalHashes, "MerkleProof: invalid multiproof");
|
||||
|
||||
// The xxxPos values are "pointers" to the next value to consume in each array. All accesses are done using
|
||||
// `xxx[xxxPos++]`, which return the current value and increment the pointer, thus mimicking a queue's "pop".
|
||||
@ -123,10 +121,10 @@ library MerkleProof {
|
||||
// - a value from the "main queue". If not all leaves have been consumed, we get the next leaf, otherwise we
|
||||
// get the next hash.
|
||||
// - depending on the flag, either another value for the "main queue" (merging branches) or an element from the
|
||||
// `proofs` array.
|
||||
// `proof` array.
|
||||
for (uint256 i = 0; i < totalHashes; i++) {
|
||||
bytes32 a = leafPos < leavesLen ? leaves[leafPos++] : hashes[hashPos++];
|
||||
bytes32 b = proofFlag[i] ? leafPos < leavesLen ? leaves[leafPos++] : hashes[hashPos++] : proofs[proofPos++];
|
||||
bytes32 b = proofFlags[i] ? leafPos < leavesLen ? leaves[leafPos++] : hashes[hashPos++] : proof[proofPos++];
|
||||
hashes[i] = _hashPair(a, b);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -135,7 +133,7 @@ library MerkleProof {
|
||||
} else if (leavesLen > 0) {
|
||||
return leaves[0];
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return proofs[0];
|
||||
return proof[0];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ contract('MerkleProof', function (accounts) {
|
||||
const proof = merkleTree.getMultiProof(proofLeaves);
|
||||
const proofFlags = merkleTree.getProofFlags(proofLeaves, proof);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(await this.merkleProof.multiProofVerify(root, proofLeaves, proof, proofFlags)).to.equal(true);
|
||||
expect(await this.merkleProof.multiProofVerify(proof, proofFlags, root, proofLeaves)).to.equal(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('returns false for an invalid Merkle multi proof', async function () {
|
||||
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ contract('MerkleProof', function (accounts) {
|
||||
const badProof = badMerkleTree.getMultiProof(badProofLeaves);
|
||||
const badProofFlags = badMerkleTree.getProofFlags(badProofLeaves, badProof);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(await this.merkleProof.multiProofVerify(root, badProofLeaves, badProof, badProofFlags)).to.equal(false);
|
||||
expect(await this.merkleProof.multiProofVerify(badProof, badProofFlags, root, badProofLeaves)).to.equal(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('revert with invalid multi proof #1', async function () {
|
||||
@ -104,10 +104,10 @@ contract('MerkleProof', function (accounts) {
|
||||
|
||||
await expectRevert(
|
||||
this.merkleProof.multiProofVerify(
|
||||
root,
|
||||
[ leaves[0], badLeaf ], // A, E
|
||||
[ leaves[1], fill, merkleTree.layers[1][1] ],
|
||||
[ false, false, false ],
|
||||
root,
|
||||
[ leaves[0], badLeaf ], // A, E
|
||||
),
|
||||
'MerkleProof: invalid multiproof',
|
||||
);
|
||||
@ -123,10 +123,10 @@ contract('MerkleProof', function (accounts) {
|
||||
|
||||
await expectRevert(
|
||||
this.merkleProof.multiProofVerify(
|
||||
root,
|
||||
[ badLeaf, leaves[0] ], // A, E
|
||||
[ leaves[1], fill, merkleTree.layers[1][1] ],
|
||||
[ false, false, false, false ],
|
||||
root,
|
||||
[ badLeaf, leaves[0] ], // A, E
|
||||
),
|
||||
'reverted with panic code 0x32',
|
||||
);
|
||||
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ contract('MerkleProof', function (accounts) {
|
||||
const proof = merkleTree.getMultiProof(proofLeaves);
|
||||
const proofFlags = merkleTree.getProofFlags(proofLeaves, proof);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(await this.merkleProof.multiProofVerify(root, proofLeaves, proof, proofFlags)).to.equal(true);
|
||||
expect(await this.merkleProof.multiProofVerify(proof, proofFlags, root, proofLeaves)).to.equal(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('limit case: can prove empty leaves', async function () {
|
||||
@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ contract('MerkleProof', function (accounts) {
|
||||
const merkleTree = new MerkleTree(leaves, keccak256, { sort: true });
|
||||
|
||||
const root = merkleTree.getRoot();
|
||||
expect(await this.merkleProof.multiProofVerify(root, [], [ root ], [])).to.equal(true);
|
||||
expect(await this.merkleProof.multiProofVerify([ root ], [], root, [])).to.equal(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user